ZHUOJIN-LOGOZhuojin Pipe Fitting Co., Ltd
Zhuojin Pipe Fitting Co., Ltd
STEEL PIPE · FITTING · WELDING TECHNICAL STUDY

Rolling Contact Wear Behavior of Partially Overlay-Repaired U75V Rail

Literature Overview

The paper by Rong Bin, Wang Yongqiang, Zhao Huoping, Liu Shaopeng, and Shen Mingxue (2023, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Materials, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 67-72) investigates the rolling contact wear characteristics of U75V rail specimens that have undergone localized overlay welding repair. The study employs a two-stage continuous rolling contact wear test combining dry and wet conditions, comparing the tribological behavior of both un-repaired and partially overlay-repaired rail samples. This research is significant because rail head wear repair through overlay welding is a widely adopted maintenance strategy in railway engineering, yet the rolling contact performance of the repaired zone and its surrounding heat-affected region remains insufficiently understood.

Core Technical Findings

The experimental results reveal distinct tribological behaviors across different zones of the overlay-repaired rail. In the dry wear stage, both specimen types exhibit adhesion coefficients around 0.60, with the partially overlay-repaired specimen showing a slightly higher value. Upon transitioning to the wet wear stage, the adhesion coefficient drops sharply to approximately 0.25 for both specimens, but the relative relationship reverses — the overlay-repaired specimen now shows a lower adhesion coefficient than the un-repaired one.

The microstructural analysis of three distinct zones provides the mechanistic explanation for these observations:

Zone Microstructure Relative Hardness Surface Roughness After Wear Plastic Deformation Crack Behavior
Overlay layer Predominantly martensite Highest Minimal surface damage Negligible No obvious cracks
Heat-affected zone (HAZ) Ferrite + pearlite + martensite mixture Intermediate Maximum roughness Significant Large-angle extended cracks
Un-repaired zone Predominantly pearlite Lowest Flat surface Obvious Small number of cracks

Interpretation of Technical Points

The overlay layer's predominantly martensitic microstructure, achieved through rapid solidification and self-tempering during the welding process, provides superior resistance to rolling contact fatigue. The high hardness of martensite resists plastic deformation at the contact interface, thereby minimizing surface roughness development and crack initiation. This is consistent with classical tribology principles where hardness is the primary factor governing abrasive and adhesive wear resistance.

The HAZ presents the most critical concern from an engineering reliability standpoint. The mixed microstructure of ferrite, pearlite, and martensite results from the thermal cycle experienced during overlay welding without subsequent heat treatment. The hardness of this zone is intermediate, but the heterogeneous microstructure creates stress concentrations at phase boundaries during rolling contact loading. The observation of large-angle crack propagation in this zone is particularly alarming because these cracks can serve as initiation sites for rolling contact fatigue (RCF) spalling, which is a primary failure mode in railway applications.

The un-repaired pearlitic zone, while exhibiting the lowest hardness, shows a relatively benign wear behavior characterized by a flat worn surface and only minor cracking. This suggests that the homogeneous microstructure of the base material provides more uniform deformation during rolling contact, despite the lower hardness.

Engineering Practice Implications

For railway maintenance engineering, this study underscores a critical point: the HAZ of overlay-repaired rails may represent the weakest link in the repair strategy. Several practical recommendations emerge:

  1. Post-weld heat treatment should be considered to homogenize the HAZ microstructure, potentially through local tempering or stress-relief annealing, to reduce the risk of crack initiation.
  2. The overlay layer composition should be optimized to ensure adequate toughness in addition to hardness, particularly when the service environment involves wet conditions where adhesion coefficients drop significantly.
  3. Inspection protocols for repaired rails should prioritize the HAZ region, employing methods such as ultrasonic testing (UT) or magnetic particle inspection (MT) to detect early-stage cracks before they propagate to critical lengths.
  4. The transition from dry to wet wear conditions represents a significant change in tribological regime, and maintenance schedules should account for seasonal variations in track conditions.

Key Questions and Reflections

The study raises important questions that warrant further investigation. First, the long-term durability of the overlay layer under repeated thermal cycling and rolling contact loading remains unclear. Second, the effect of overlay layer thickness on the HAZ microstructure gradient and the resulting mechanical properties deserves systematic study. Third, the interaction between the overlay layer and the rail web — particularly regarding stress distribution and potential delamination — is not addressed in this work. Finally, the comparison between different overlay welding consumables and processes (e.g., GTAW vs. GMAW vs. plasma arc) for rail repair applications could provide valuable guidance for standardization efforts.

The research contributes meaningfully to the understanding of rail repair metallurgy, but the practical translation of these findings into updated maintenance standards and procedures requires additional validation through field trials and accelerated fatigue testing under realistic loading spectra.