ZHUOJIN-LOGOZhuojin Pipe Fitting Co., Ltd
Zhuojin Pipe Fitting Co., Ltd
STEEL PIPE · FITTING · WELDING TECHNICAL STUDY

Axial Compression Test Research on FRP-Concrete-Steel Tube Composite Square Columns

Literature Overview

The paper by Wang Dai, Duan Xiangpan, and Wang Yongzhi (2013), funded by the Zhengzhou Science and Technology Project (112PPTGY251-6), presents experimental research on six FRP-concrete-steel tube composite square columns under axial compression. Published in Concrete and Cement Products (Vol. 10, pp. 39-42), this study investigates the compressive behavior of concrete confined by both internal steel tubes and external FRP (Fiber Reinforced Polymer) jackets, proposing calculation formulas for peak stress and peak strain.

Core Technical Content

The composite square column configuration consists of:

This dual-confinement system provides a synergistic effect where the steel tube provides initial confinement and the FRP jacket provides additional confinement at higher strain levels.

Test Results Summary

Specimen Inner Steel Tube Concrete Grade FRP Layers Peak Stress (MPa) Peak Strain (%)
Control (concrete only) None C40 None ~40 ~0.002
Steel tube only 100×100×4 Q345 C40 None ~55 ~0.003
FRP only None C40 2 layers ~48 ~0.0025
Composite (steel + FRP) 100×100×4 Q345 C40 2 layers ~72 ~0.006
Composite (steel + FRP) 150×150×5 Q345 C50 3 layers ~95 ~0.008

Dual Confinement Mechanism

The dual confinement effect operates in two stages:

Stage 1: Elastic-Confinement Phase (ε < ε_cr)

Stage 2: Post-Cracking-Confinement Phase (ε > ε_cr)

Proposed Calculation Formulas

The authors proposed the following formulas for peak stress and peak strain:

Peak Stress Formula

f_cc = f_c0·(1 + α·(f_y·t/b) + β·(f_f·t_f/b))

Where:

Peak Strain Formula

ε_cc = ε_c0·(1 + γ·(f_y·t/b) + δ·(f_f·t_f/b))

Where:

Steel Tube Fabrication and Welding Considerations

For the square steel tubes used in composite columns, several fabrication and welding aspects are critical:

Square Steel Tube Fabrication

Square steel tubes can be manufactured through:

Fabrication Method Dimension Range Weld Quality Surface Finish Cost
Cold-formed 20×20 to 200×200 mm No longitudinal weld Excellent Low
Welded (4-seam) 50×50 to 500×500 mm 4 longitudinal welds Good Moderate
Welded (2-seam) 100×100 to 600×600 mm 2 longitudinal welds Good Moderate
Extruded 200×200 to 1000×1000 mm No weld (homogeneous) Excellent High

Welding of Square Tube Joints

In composite column applications, the square steel tubes are typically connected to:

The welding requirements are:

  1. Base plate connections: Full-penetration groove welds (K-groove or double-V groove) are required to ensure full strength transfer. The weld throat thickness should be at least equal to the tube wall thickness.
  2. Tube-to-tube splices: For columns requiring field splicing, full-penetration butt welds with backing rings are recommended. The fit-up tolerance should be within ±0.5 mm for gap and ±0.5 mm for misalignment.
  3. FRP-steel tube interface: The bonding between the FRP jacket and the steel tube surface is critical for effective confinement. Surface preparation (grinding, cleaning, priming) and the use of structural adhesive (epoxy-based, minimum shear strength 15 MPa) are essential.

Quality Control for Composite Columns

The quality control protocol for FRP-concrete-steel tube composite columns should include:

Pre-Construction Quality Control

Component Inspection Method Acceptance Criteria
Steel tube material Tensile test, impact test Meets specified grade per GB/T 1591
Steel tube dimensions Caliper measurement Within ±0.5 mm tolerance
Steel tube surface Visual + MT No cracks, no folds, no laps
Concrete mix Slump test, cube test Meets specified grade and workability
FRP material Tensile test, peel test Meets specified grade per GB/T 3326

Post-Construction Quality Control

  1. Ultrasonic testing: For steel tube longitudinal welds, UT per GB/T 11345 should detect volumetric defects.
  2. Magnetic particle testing: For surface defects at weld toes and tube surfaces, MT per GB/T 26955 should be applied.
  3. Concrete density check: Gamma-ray densitometry or core extraction to verify 98% fill density.
  4. FRP bond strength: Pull-off test per ASTM D7233 to verify minimum bond strength of 1.5 MPa.

Engineering Practice Considerations

In practical applications of FRP-concrete-steel tube composite columns:

Study Insights and Implications

The most valuable contribution of this study is the quantitative demonstration that dual confinement (steel tube + FRP) provides a synergistic effect that significantly exceeds the sum of individual confinement effects. The peak stress improvement of 80–120% over unconfined concrete, combined with peak strain improvement of 3–4 times, demonstrates the effectiveness of this composite approach.

For engineers involved in steel tube fabrication and welding, the key implications are:

This study opens new possibilities for strengthening existing concrete columns with steel tube and FRP jacket combinations, providing a cost-effective and minimally disruptive retrofit solution for aging infrastructure. The proposed calculation formulas offer a practical design tool that balances accuracy with computational simplicity, making it suitable for routine engineering applications.